There were a good bit of reasons, but mainly because they wanted power.
Based on historical perspective, the significance of the place where the French built Fort Duquesne and where George Washington was ordered to build a fort is that "<u>It was near rivers important for controlling the Ohio Valley."</u>
<h3>Where and When was Fort Duquesne built?</h3>
Fort Duquesne was built in 1754 by the French around the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers in present-day Pennsylvania.
<h3>Reason George Washington ordered to build a fort at the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers</h3>
During the French Indian War between 1754 to 1763, Ohio River Valley was crucial for trading with Native Americans and settling for colonists.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>"it was near rivers important for controlling the Ohio Valley</u>."
Learn more about Ohio Valley here: brainly.com/question/515682
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Lars is completing a history project about World War I. On the British government's National Archives website, he finds letters from American soldiers as well as documents written by museum curators and historians that give background information about the war, supported by primary sources from their archives' collections.
Which descriptions best characterize this information? Select three options.
a. outdated facts, b. credible sources, c. primary sources, d. biased information
, e. reasoned judgment
Answer:
b. credible sources
c. primary sources
e. reasoned judgment
Explanation:
Primary sources are documents that were made and built at the time the historic event they document is taking place. In that case, they can claim that the letters that American soldiers wrote during the First World War are a primary source.
A credible source is one that is written by an expert on a given subject, in addition, these sources have evidence that supports all the statements they present. When Lars uses historical sources written by curators and historians who used primary sources as evidence, he is using credible feints.
After doing this research, Lars will be able to draw conclusions about the first world war using these sources as evidence, thus making an easoned judgment.
Answer:
The post-traumatic disorder that soldiers acquired prevented them from achieving a normal life because the slightest stimulus could lead them to terrible memories about the crash causing collapses and nervous crises at any time.
Explanation:
The post-traumatic upheaval that the ex-soldiers who fought in the first world war acquired prevented them from being able to return to a normal life due to the constant breakdowns that the simplest of social elements caused in them. The traumas they went through during the war, made them see flashbacks that caused strong paranoia and prevented them from living in a family, social and even professional environment, as they had terrifying nervous crises and that left them completely out of their minds.
