Answer:
0.67
Step-by-step explanation:
2/3= to 0.66 which means 0.67 would be technally larger than 0.66
Answer:
$0 < p ≤ $25
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that coach Rivas can spend up to $750 on 30 swimsuits.
This means that the maximum cost that the coach can afford to pay is $750, then if the cost for the 30 swimsuits is C, we have the inequality:
C ≤ $750
Now, if each swimsuit costs p, then 30 of them costs 30 times p, then the cost of the swimsuits is:
C = 30*p
Then we have the inequality:
30*p ≤ $750.
To find the possible values of p, we just need to isolate p in one side of the inequality.
So we can divide both sides by 30 to get:
(30*p)/30 ≤ $750/30
p ≤ $25
And we also should add the restriction:
$0 < p ≤ $25
Because a swimsuit can not cost 0 dollars or less than that.
Then the inequality that represents the possible values of p is:
$0 < p ≤ $25
:) Well, I dunno about anyone else but this question makes my head spin!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The area of the model is equal to the area of a rectangle
The area of a rectangle is equal to
we have
substitute
Apply distributive property
Combine like terms
Answer:
Newton's second law of motion pertains to the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are not balanced. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object. As the force acting upon an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is increased. As the mass of an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is decreased.
Step-by-step explanation:
I believe A is wrong, but I´m unsure.
