Answer:
$
Market value of common stocks (6,000 x $25) = 150,000
Market value of preferred stocks (9,000 x $20) = 180,000
Market value of the company 330,000
Proceeds allocated to common stocks
= $150,000/$330,000 x $312,000
= $141,818
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
The market value of the company is the aggregate of market value of common stocks and market value of preferred stocks.The market value of each stock is equal to number of each stock outstanding multiplied by market price per share. Thus, the proceeds allocated to common stock equals the market value of equity divided by market value of the company multiplied by the lump sum.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
A. <span>making at least the minimum payment, even if they are late</span>
Answer:
This question is incomplete, the options are missing. The options are the following:
a) For consumer purposes
b) For commercial purposes
c) Usurious
d) An online contract
And the correct answer is the option C: Usurious.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the area of law, the term known as <em>"Usury" </em>is refer to the practice that focuses on making the lender richer in unethical ways so therefore that this practice is considered to be the one that makes inmoral monetary loans that try to affect the borrower in order to benefit the lender. One example of the use of this term could be the case in where the lender charges or try to charges a higher interest rate to the borrower than the one that is prohibited by law as a maximun rate.
