Answer:
b. Production
Explanation:
Global Value Chains have been successful over the years due to most components being produced in the country where<em> it is cheaper to do so</em> and then the final output<em> is integrated in other country</em>.
Thus globalization of production has enabled <em>firms</em> to take advantage of national differences in the cost and quality of factors of production.
Answer:
the difference between revenue and variable cost
Explanation:
As we know that
Producer surplus is = Total Revenue - Total Variable Cost
So here we can see that the producer surplus would be the difference between the revenue & the variable cost in the industry i.e. perfectly competitive
Hence, the second last option is correct
And, the other options are wrong
A marketing leaders adopts a service-dominant logic as guiding principle when there is shift in balance from tangible goods to intangible services.
<h3>What is
service-dominant logic?</h3>
This logic refers to a perspective which introduces a new method for articulating an alternative view of exchange and value creation in the markets.
In conclusion, sometimes, a marketing leaders adopts a service-dominant logic as guiding principle when there is shift in balance from tangible goods to intangible services.
Read more about service-dominant logic
<em>brainly.com/question/17961245</em>
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
The revenue earned by team for each game is
= $10 + 50% of $8
= $10 + 4
= $14
Now the revenue for each session is
= $14 × 30 PEOPLE × 6 games
= $2,520
The total cost would be
= $100 × 3 + $1,000 × 3
= $300 + $3,000
= $3,300
And, the team would finished the season for profit of
= Revenue - cost
= $2,520 - $3,300
= $780 loss
A corn farmer is considered a free rider if he chooses not to join the national interest group his fellow farmers created, yet still reaps the benefits of the tax incentives the group lobbied for and won.
The free rider problem is an economic concept of a market failure that occurs when people or individuals are benefiting from resources, goods or services that they do not pay for. In our case, the corn farmer is benefiting from the tax incentives the group lobbied for, yet he or she made zero input or effort to contribute to the groups agenda in getting tax incentives. <span />
