1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergey [27]
3 years ago
14

What role did Thomas Lynch, Jr., Thomas Heyward, Jr., Edward Rutledge, and Arthur Middleton have as part of the Second Continent

al Congress?
They boycotted the Congress and refused to participate unless South Carolina was given more delegates.
They encouraged the Congress to take action to help South Carolinians in the Upcountry.
They served as delegates to the Congress and signed the Declaration of Independence.
O They argued against independence and refused to sign the Declaration of Independence.
History
1 answer:
Elden [556K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C. They served as delegates to the Congress and signed the Declaration of Independence.

Explanation:

  • There's a Quizlet called "Unit 3A, Lesson 3" that helps a lot!
You might be interested in
Why did the large numbers of “New Immigrants” coming to live in the United States in the late 1800s alarm Americans more than th
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

America becomes a refugee and more famous in the 18's especially for many Europeans who seek for new home in the new world called the Americas. In that time many problems like crisis brought by wars make living hard so they escape and migrate in the New World.

The America's welcome them and help them to create home in the Estados Unidos.

5 0
3 years ago
1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer and Explanation:

Bradstreet has an aggressive and negative view of the North American indigenous people, he believes that they are savage, violent, uncivilized and that they must be fought in the name of the goals of the English. He believes that the Indians are oppressive and that this should not be tolerated. He believes that the Indians will unite against England and for that reason it is necessary to be prepared. Probably, this view that Bradstreet has towards indigenous people comes from bad experiences he had with the tribes, as well as an imperialist thought full of prejudices and a strong racism and intolerance.

Johnson, on the other hand, although he believes that indigenous people are uncivilized, he believes that working for them will be more profitable for the English, than fighting them. He believes that indigenous people are a fascinating people and that they have dominion over the lands that the English are taking over. Even in the midst of this, the Indians are willing to divide the land and for this they make small demands that can easily be met by the English, establishing harmony with all peoples. Johnson's view comes from the humanistic character and the peaceful nature that he possessed.

3 0
3 years ago
How was Justice for slaves (and all men of color) is different from justice for whites.​
Mashutka [201]
Many slaves and blacks did not get justice, and whites got off with a lot.The system was racially biased in the time period.
3 0
3 years ago
Which battle resulted in both a Confederate victory and the death of General Stonewall Jackson?
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Second Battle of Bull Run

Explanation:

#FreeMelvin

7 0
3 years ago
Why might a government intervene in a market economy during times of war? to increase profits to mobilize resources quickly to c
babymother [125]

The correct answer is B) to mobilize resources quickly.

A government might intervene in a market economy during times of war to mobilize resources quickly.

although a country operates under a Capitalist economy, during times of war the system can be adjusted.

In the free-enterprise system, the federal government has minimum regulation of the economy. The free market is the main component of Capitalism where owners can be as rich as they can, and employees can benefit from bonuses and other incentives.

However, during a war, the government needs to mobilize resources quickly to send weaponry and supplies to the war front. That is why it can intervene in the economy. Indeed this was what happened in the United States during World War I and World War II.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one of the major problems facing those who depend on the Nile river for water
    9·1 answer
  • What is the first step in adding an amendment to the U.S. Constitution? The amendment is sent to the state legislatures by the p
    8·2 answers
  • List three reasons why the southern states seceded
    13·1 answer
  • According to the United Nations, what are two of the steps the Security Council may take to address an act of aggression, or war
    8·2 answers
  • What are two things severely hurting the Soviet economy just prior to its fall
    14·1 answer
  • Match the descriptions to the various aspects of total war during World War I.
    9·1 answer
  • HELP HURRY ASAP PLZ BRAINLIEST
    15·1 answer
  • ANSWER ASAP!!!
    11·2 answers
  • The battle of waterloo took place in which country?.
    11·2 answers
  • What role did the supreme court play in the election of 2000?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!