<span>Although hotly debated, it can be claimed that European contact in the Americas benefitted the world in a positive way due to the fact that it created extra opportunity for the current civilizations, as well as opened up an entirely new region of the world that had not been discovered.</span>
The change brought by the war for black Americans was limited and contested. The war presented new demands for labour, generating opportunities for African Americans (AA) to economically participate, gain skills and escape poverty. By 1945, bans on AA serving in the Marines and Army Air Corps were lifted, and the proportion of AA employed in defence industries increased by 7% compared to 4 years earlier reaching almost 8%. The war also sparked surge in civil rights activism, and a new language of rights. Membership in NAACP doubled between the beginning and the end of the war, and the 'Double V' campaign among AA press stressed the disjuncture between fighting to end fascism abroad, whilst failing to secure rights at home. In spite this progress, advancement was always contested and did not necessarily last once the war ended. Companies, including Chicago’s Maremont Automobile Company, continued to refuse to hire black employees, and when they were hired they rarely earned 50% of their white-counterparts' wage. Once white citizens returned from the war, they generally reclaimed their roles. Additionally, increases in civil rights activism did not prevent race riots in 47 cities between 1940 and 1945, as AA moved to the North and West of America in search for jobs.
The answer is Muckrakers They were dedicated to exposing what they saw as negative conditions in American society.
Answer:
Because of their religion
Explanation:
In the Qu’ran, it calls people to indoctrinate other people of different religions. now depending one which part of the Qu’ran you look, one part will say do it peacefully, while the other would say make them become Muslim or they should die.
"Americans expected the future to be worse than the past" was the main idea of President Carter's "Crisis of Confidence" speech.
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
President Carter's address on "Crisis of Confidence" was triggered by the energy crisis and recession in the country. He himself was a strongly religious man, placed forth the notion that a moral and theological problem at its heart was America's dilemma.
A lack of social and spiritual confidence, as he put it, meant Americans found themselves too poor to pull themselves out of economic malaise, which was forcing them to imagine that future will be more devastating than the past. He also admitted a share of the blame himself, not being powerful enough in his governance on topics such as energy use and oil resource use.
