<em>Answer:</em>
<em>a. fundamental attribution error.</em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>The fundamental attribution error</em><em> is one of the key concepts in psychology which was proposed by a social psychologist named </em><em>Lee Ross</em><em> during </em><em>1977.</em><em> It is described as a person's proclivity to explain the other person's behavior on the basis of a few internal factors, for example, disposition as well as personality and underestimates the various influence of the external factors, for example, situational influences that can have on his or her behavior. </em>
<em>According to the question, the given statement is an example of the fundamental attribution error. </em>
Answer:
(C) The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
Explanation:
State laws have more authority than local laws. For this reason, when a statuary law is sanctioned, it must replace existing local laws for the same subject. It is at this point that we can observe what the problem with the petition shown in the above question may be, making this petition circulating misleading to some readers.
Many cities, counties, and others have local smocking restriction laws that are much broader than the state law the petition wants to be sanctioned. Some people do not understand the relationship between state and local laws and will think this state law will help local smocking restriction law, when in fact state law will replace it.
Answer:
its c: One scientist finds evidence that she feels doesn't fit a theory. Other scientists agree that her results are valid.
Explanation:
Answer:
Cotton
Explanation:
At that time, cotton was considered as cash crops. Is the type of agricultural crop that generate high amount of income with very little investment /efforts. Many southern plantations sold the cottons to Other manufacturers in Europe since they need it as materials for textiles, outdoor equipment's, and beds.
This made a lot of plantation owners in the South had a need to obtain lands in order to open up new factories. A lot of lands near them at that time owned by Native Americans. So, the government forcefully removed the natives from the ancestral land and move them to reservation.