The fact that he is making them in the shape of molecules, or maybe one of the metalsmiths suddenly decided to be lazy, or maybe cat shaped charms is the new "in" thing
Answer:
Well there are lots of things to the response to this
Explanation:
A procedure of response blocking or flooding, works because the fear-eliciting properties of the CS are extinguished. Learned helplessness is likely to develop if, controllable shocks are preceded by uncontrollable shocks.
___________________________________________________________
More specific
___________________________________________________________
-works because the subject's expectations about the consequences of failing to respond are changed
-should not work
-works because the fear-eliciting properties of the CS are extinguished
-works because flooding produces a drastic stimulus change
Answer:
it's C) They were sold at auctions, like animals.
Explanation:
Because before that had owner they had to be bought off and before they became free that had to escape from their owners.
The nabonidus chronicle confirms that <u> Belshazzar</u> was coregent as stated in the book of daniel.
Who was Belshazzar ?
- Daniel 5 makes reference to Belshazzar, the last ruler of ancient Babylon.
- During Daniel, the prophet's lifetime, Belshazzar was a king for a brief period.
- His name, Bel guard the king, is a supplication to a Babylonian deity; as his tale demonstrates, Bel was unable to stop this wicked tyrant.
- Belshazzar was the ruler of Babylon, a strong country with a long succession of strong monarchs.
- One of those kings was Nebuchadnezzar, who had conquered Judah and taken Daniel and a large number of other captives to Babylon along with the treasures from the temple.
- Belshazzar was Nebuchadnezzar's descendant through his daughter Nitocris.
To learn more about Belshazzar, refer:
brainly.com/question/1225124
#SPJ4
The correct answer is the belief perseverance phenomenon.
As the name itself says, this phenomenon has to do with a particular belief sticking with you even though it was originally based on faulty assumptions. So, Andre thought that his missing wallet was stolen by his roommate - and even though he later found out that wasn't the case, still the distrust of his roommate remained, even though it is irrational.