Answer:
Explanation:
They both are right especially during the time of their presidency. Thomas Jefferson believed that a strong federal government proved itself to be a necessity although he probably didn't like the idea at all. After all the founding fathers tried the Articles of Confederation (ratified 1781) and found out that it didn't really work.
Eight years later, they wrote the constitution that we currently live under. The federal government was given a lot more power which it needed. That doesn't mean it was fully embraced. Just that it was the next step. If anything, for all Jefferson's idealism, he was a pragmatist. If it worked, do it and be content.
====================
Lincoln saw the whole situation quite differently. The Civil War began with the underlying cause of state's rights. Later on (1863), Lincoln turned to the question of slavery. There was a hole even in the 1789 Constitution and that hole came back to haunt everyone. The question was individual rights. Slaves. The south could not easily survive without slave labor and because slaves were expensive, they were more or less humanely treated. After the Civil War, their condition was a nightmare. Lincoln address the entire question of what was missing in the constitution although he did not bring any amendments to correct what he knew had to be corrected. He may have done so if he was not murdered. As it was it was left to Johnson to bring in the 13th amendment, which abolished slavery.
First, we need to take the integral of ∛x+2 which is the same as x^1/3+2. To integrate the first part, we add one to the exponent and multiply by the new exponent's reciprocal to get 3/4*x^4/3. Then, the 2 would become a 2x. Now, we are finding the value of 3/4*x^4/3+2x from -1 to 1. To do this, you plug in the top value (1) first, and then subtract the result of plugging in the lower value (-1): [3/4*1^4/3+2(1)]-[3/4*(-1)^4/3+2(-1)]. This would be simplified to [3/4+2]-[3/4-2]. After distributing the negative, it becomes 3/4+2-3/4+2 or simply 4.
I hope this helps
When the political conventions are held in close proximity then the voters get disengaged resulting in negative consequences. Thus, option A is the correct option.
<h3>What are conventions?</h3>
The meeting in a particular region especially for the political campaigns to address the common interest of the audience is called the conventions. It is conducted to address the voters.
The two conventions when held close disengage the audience and result in confusion and loss. It does not increase the viewership, or voter turnout, though it has a little influence and effect it majorly is negative.
Therefore, option A. the conventions disengage the voters.
Learn more about voter turnout here:
brainly.com/question/12235303
#SPJ1
Answer:
D)
Explanation:
I honestly don't like this question. It's a really poor question. But anyway, here's the explanation:
1) All search results are <em>somewhat </em>relevant. They have the keyword "cell phone" in every result. So none should be considered off-topic.
2) Matching personal opinion with given answer choices.
My personal list if any, would have been 3, 1, 2, 4.
But since the author has helped as out, 3 and 2 are guaranteed to be the top choices, the last part is determining whether search result 4 is more relevant compared to 2.
Since I believe 1 is somewhat relevant, A and C are negated. Leaving, B and D. In this situation, I would prefer 1 than 4 since search result 4 doesn't exactly help your research paper compared to search result 1. Therefore, the only choice is D.
