According to Aristotle, both tragedy and epic are forms of imitation. Tragedy imitates directly by means of mimesis and epic both directly and indirectly by means of mimesis and diegesis. While epic imitates solely by means of words, tragedy also imitates by means of spectacle. Both epic and tragedy portray people better or greater than the average spectator, unlike comedy which portrays people as worse than they actually are and uses humour to dissuade us from acting badly (Aristotle's lost treatise on comedy may be summarized in the Tractatus Coislinianus; see also Eco, The Name of the Rose for interesting view of Aristotle on comedy)
Due to practical constraints of production, tragedy ideally has a single unified action which is often restricted to a specific time and place. and a small n umber of characters, while epic has a broader scope of coverage.
It’s is Ccccccccccccccccccccccccc. Lol
Which trend during the 1920's does this image reflect?
I pretty sure it's sorry if its wrong.
The Growth of the advertising industry
Answer:
A (As far as my knowledge goes, I might be wrong)
Explanation:
A. Trade was increased, so this is the right answer
B. The European Christians did not win the Holy Land from the Muslims, so this is the wrong answer
C. Although art and music was inspired by the Crusades, it's subjective, and I'm assuming this isn't multiple choice.
D. The crusades was a fight over religion, this isn't even possible
Answer:
From the items she was buried with.
Explanation:
Other items buried with her showed she had a rich and elegant life of wine, food, books, makeup, lacquered dinnerware, and drinking vessels, which is key evidence to show her social stance. During that time, only people in the top class could use lacquered vessels rather than bronze.
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/279374#ixzz6oGLZ649V
