The answer is A. <span>debts.</span>
These scientists are called behaviorists, where they examine the actions and drives to which humans respond and act towards a stimuli and from environmental origin.
Learned, this behavior is caused by imitating the behavior of an another individual.
Innate, an approach where behavior is said to have a biological origin and not shaped by the environment such as reflex response.
Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
If a social media campaigner runs a campaign against the violation of human rights, he may be tagged as a propagandist. He may also be reported by the authorities to express his views on such site.
<h3>What is a social media campaign?</h3>
The use of social media for the purpose of expression of views towards the public is known as a social media campaign. The person who runs such activities is known as a campaigner.
When the campaigner posts his views regarding violation of human rights, people may mark him as a propagandist and his views may not reach the right audience. He may receive hate speech for the same.
Hence, the drawbacks of a social media campaign are aforementioned.
Learn more about social media campaigns here:
brainly.com/question/7227325
#SPJ1
<u>Answer:</u>
The Hawaiian kupana or ancestors passed on their understanding of the physical and spiritual life to the next generations through the oral storytelling mele chant is a TRUE statement.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Until the art of writing had not been introduced to or developed among the tribes of the Hawaii islands, the only way they had of passing the knowledge of physical and spiritual life was through telling their next generations the stories of People from the past who had mastered physical and spiritual efficiency.
- Through storytelling, the elders made sure that their young ones are prepared thoroughly to carry forward the legacy, tradition, and culture.
At the time, the government was considered to be democratic, the only federalist officers were the judges. In marbury v Madison the judge, was a federalist (Judge Marshall). What happened was Jefferson order the Secretary of state to not deliver commissions to federalist judges. Marybury sued for commissions, which created the case. What was significant was Marshall used the judiciary act to rule Marbury had commission, but it gave the court grater power than the constitution make the act unconstitutional. Marbury lost the case but the federalist judges won in the end. This case created Judicial review which let the supreme court exercise the power to decide weather an act of congress was allowed by the constitution. This gave the judges more power
