1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Varvara68 [4.7K]
3 years ago
9

How was the decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford changed? Be sure to provide the name and a brief description of the congressional

act, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling that overturned the decision
Social Studies
1 answer:
SCORPION-xisa [38]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.

You might be interested in
Christine, a seven-year-old girl, is upset because her parents are getting divorced. She has begun to wet the bed again, and she
Montano1993 [528]

I believe the answer is: Regression

Regression refers to the process of slipping to our earlier stage of development when facing difficult situation rather than making an adaptation to face it.

This coping mechanism would make the person who do it act in non-suitable manner considering their age. Other example would be college students who throw temper tantrum like children when facing things that they considered as offensive.

7 0
3 years ago
Should the diet of worms condemn Martin Luther?
MArishka [77]
Yes probably if he has die then it might condemn martin luther
8 0
3 years ago
Hello i need help on this​
mylen [45]
Winter they call it winter PLEASE GIVE ME BRAINLYEST
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Western cultures, time is expressed in an ego-centric fashion. The present is indicated by pointing down, the future is indic
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

Time was ego-centered, but reversed from Western cultures (i.e. the future is indicated by pointing backward and the past is indicated by pointing forward).

Explanation:

The Aymara, an indigenous group in the Andes highlands around Bolivia, Chile. They are said to have a time concept that is different from our own. Certain novel studies were made scientists to uncover the facts that the Aymara consider the past to be ahead and the future behind them. Time was mapped with the properties of space.

5 0
3 years ago
Write a Supreme Court opinion that describes your decision for United
Korvikt [17]

I think it have to do with the rich and the poor the farmers or sum...

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did European countries meet in Germany to divide Africa
    14·2 answers
  • Societies in which people depend on their family efforts to supply their needs are called
    15·1 answer
  • Who is the author of the boy in the stripped pajamas?
    9·2 answers
  • Which is the correct role of the excretory system? *
    5·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Dr. Martin Luther King’s "Letter from Birmingham Jail." Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct action c
    15·1 answer
  • How is a single-shot firearm different from a repeating firearm?
    15·2 answers
  • Use the story below fill I the questions.
    12·1 answer
  • What is one thing that makes essential fatty acids so unique?.
    15·1 answer
  • Children learn the ways of their elders, and the values, norms, and behaviors of a society are perpetuated, which is known as: G
    7·1 answer
  • You are on a call for a patient who was assaulted. law enforcement is on the scene. you are not directly involved with patient c
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!