All categories

3 years ago

What is one detail that makes Marco’s story believable?

History

2 answers:

kiruha [24]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: what are the answers it gives you?

Explanation:

Lilit [14]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Marco's realization that Mulberry Street intersects with Bliss Street leads him to imagine a group of police escorts. The scene becomes a parade, as he then imagines a grandstand filled with the mayor and aldermen; an airplane dropping confetti; and, in the final incarnation of the scene, a Chinese man, a magician pulling rabbits out of a hat, and a man with a ten-foot beard. Now almost home, he snaps back to reality and rushes up the front steps, eager to tell his father his imagined story. However, when his father questions him about what he saw on his way home, his face turns red and he says, "Nothing ... but a plain horse and wagon on Mulberry Street."

Explanation:

You might be interested in

The Congress shall have Power To . . . make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoi

andreyandreev [35.5K]

C. Implied powers

In the U.S., implied powers are powers authorized by the Constitution that, as the word "implied" said, seems implied by powers that are outspokenly stated. It was Alexander Hamilton who defended the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States against protests, giving life to what has now the general statement of implied powers.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Last Battles of WWI: Explain in your own words what transpired

topjm [15]

Answer:

The Battle of Okinawa (April 1, 1945-June 22, 1945) was the last major battle of World War II, and one of the bloodiest. On April 1, 1945—Easter Sunday—the Navy’s Fifth Fleet and more than 180,000 U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps troops descended on the Pacific island of Okinawa for a final push towards Japan. The invasion was part of Operation Iceberg, a complex plan to invade and occupy the Ryukyu Islands, including Okinawa. Though it resulted in an Allied victory, kamikaze fighters, rainy weather and fierce fighting on land, sea and air led to a large death toll on both sides.

I HOPE IT HELPS YOU:)

<h2>PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST:)</h2>

5 0

2 years ago

What was the earliest examples of written public record of consistent laws

Kitty [74]

Answer:

Codex of Hammurabi

Explanation:

The codex of Hammurabi was a set of rules that were written by King Hammurabi who reigned Mesopotamia from 1792 to 1750 B.C. The laws were written on top of a stone stele and considered to be earliest examples of written public record of consistent laws

The codex covered set of rules that's designed to maintain order within the empire. It include things such as Punishments for criminal activities, proper way to conduct trades, and how the government officials should behave toward the people

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which author proposed the theory of "natural selection," which other people called "survival of the fittest"? A. Charles wingspa

3241004551 [841]

The author who proposed the theory of "natural selection," which other people called "survival of the fittest" was named Charles Darwin. These two ideas are the founding basis of the theory of evolution.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following describes a difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts

Radda [10]

Answer:

The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

Explanation:

Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called "Wal-lam-wat-kain," a Native American tribe.

Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.

The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.

8 0

3 years ago