1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Over [174]
3 years ago
14

What do some historians believe was the real reason to use the atomic bomb?

History
2 answers:
Lerok [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Some historians, often called "traditionalists," tend to argue that the bombs were necessary in order to save American lives and prevent an invasion of Japan. Other experts, usually called "revisionists," claim that the bombs were unnecessary and were dropped for other reasons, such as to intimidate the Soviet Union.

MrMuchimi3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Some historians, often called "traditionalists," tend to argue that the bombs were necessary in order to save American lives and prevent an invasion of Japan. Other experts, usually called "revisionists," claim that the bombs were unnecessary and were dropped for other reasons, such as to intimidate the Soviet Union

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Napoleon III became emperor in what year
Lera25 [3.4K]

1852

A year later, on 21 and 22 November 1852, the Prince-President asked the French to accept the return of the Imperial regime; it would be the Second French Empire. The referendum was favourable, and thus Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte became Emperor Napoleon III on 2 December 1852.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imperialism is the building block of colonialism
hram777 [196]
That statement is true

Imperialism is a policy to extend a nation's influence toward another nation, and colonialism is an act to politically control another country so they can exploit its economy.
So we can conclude that in order to achieve imperialism goals, colonialism is needed to be done by that imperialist nation.
8 0
3 years ago
During apartheid in South Africa, black South Africans were: A. able to use the same facilities as white South Africans. B. forb
NeX [460]

The answer is (D).

Blacks lived in the Bantustan territory, so it’s not B. Also, apartheid is the segregation and discrimination of blacks. So, choices A and C don’t make sense either.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Missouri Compromise dealt with
bija089 [108]

Answer:. The Missouri Compromise was an agreement made in order to establish a balance between the number of free and slavery states

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a monopoly?
Greeley [361]
A monopoly is when a company has controls of a whole thing of bissness
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The fourteenth amendment has nothing to do with due process
    9·1 answer
  • What was an outcome of the march revolution of 1917?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement summarizes the outcome of the Supreme Court case of Worcester v. Georgia?
    12·1 answer
  • Was the Louisiana Purchase legal?
    8·2 answers
  • Why did this battle represent a disastrous start to the war in the pacific for the u.s.?
    14·1 answer
  • You can infer from the poem that the han people highly valued _
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Jesus gave His life as a ransom for many Luke 2:40 2. "Glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee." John 17:1 3. the
    14·1 answer
  • Which state has the largest swamp in North America?
    11·2 answers
  • How are South Korea and North Korea different? I need simple answers
    11·1 answer
  • Why did many people leave farms and move to the cities in the 1800s?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!