Answer:
Pay recorded for September 29 is $2,100
Explanation:
Jeremy Ortiz is paid based on two sources of income. The first being the annual salary of $36,000 and the second is the commission on all the service contracts sold, which is 3%.
Since the pay period is of semimonthly (15 days), the annual salary would be divided by 24 instead of the regular 12 months. This would mean that salary of $1,500 ($36,000 / 24) would be recorded in the payroll register.
For the commission, the sales done during this semimonthly period was $20,000 of service contracts. The commission at 3% of all sales would be $600 ($20,000 x 3%).
Total pay recorded in the payroll register for the September 29 period would be $2,100 ($1,500 + $600).
Answer:
$4000 is the correct answer to the given question .
Explanation:
The marginal cost with compare to the labor can be written as
Here K=9 units putting this value in the previous equation we get
We can find the value of labor by the given formula that are given below
From the given question that are mention in question
Q = 2(K)1/2(L)1/2
Putting the value of K and L in the given equation we get
So profit maximizing output is =$60 chairs as the chairs can be sold for the $400 each so = $60 * $400 *10=$24000 chairs
As the competitive wage of $120 for 100 units as well as the total of $8,000 on the 9 units of capital equipment
=$20000
Therefore profit-maximizing level of output =$24000-$20000=$4000
Answer:
A video game:
Explanation:
Target your audience: kids love videos games, and crazy colors. Grab your audiences attention
Answer:
Operating cash flow= $16,792.5
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Masters, Inc., has sales of $37,900, costs of $15,000, depreciation expense of $2,400, and interest expense of $1,310.
<u>To calculate the operating cash flow, we need to use the following structure:</u>
Sales= 37,900
COGS= (15,000)
Gross profit= 22,900
Depreciation= (2,400)
Interest= (1,310)
EBT= 19,190
Tax= (19,190*0.25)= (4,797.5)
Depreciation= 2,400
Operating cash flow= 16,792.5
Answer:
Bing can immediately sue for breach of contract
Explanation:
Based on the scenario that is being described, Bing can immediately sue for breach of contract. Breaching a contract is when one party in a binding agreement fails to deliver according to the terms of the agreement. When Dill made an anticipatory repudiation, he basically stated that he does not intend to live up to the obligations of the contract that he had agreed to, therefore breaching the contract and becoming liable.
