1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Strike441 [17]
3 years ago
13

Hello, I just want talk to someone for no reason!!

History
2 answers:
erastova [34]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

ok wassup

Explanation:

allsm [11]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

hiii dear........(◍•ᴗ•◍)❤

You might be interested in
Why are primary sources important when studying historical events ?
emmasim [6.3K]

Primary sources are important when studying historical events, because they generally give eye-witness accounts of what is going on, albeit with opinions. They give historians a view of what a certain group of people think, the actions they take, and how the events affect their everyday lives. Primary sources also allow others to build on top of it, and to give 'parts of the "whole"', such as the pieces of a puzzle, to giving those in the future a more narrow and personal outlook of things.

hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is most responsible for the rapid settlement of the great plains?
svet-max [94.6K]

What got people to move to the west were the great plains were, is because of the gold rush. The president showed a giant crowd of people a jar of water, sand, and gold nuggets. He told them this is what they would find if they moved to the west. And of course everyone went searching for gold.
3 0
3 years ago
Newsreels lost popularity because they were expensive to produce.<br> a. true<br> b. false
german

Answer:

true

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Q.17
docker41 [41]

2. He claimed New York Harbor and the Hudson River for the Dutch.

3. He sailed to North America four times.

5 0
3 years ago
Which is NOT a reason for why the iron industry started in England?
alexandr1967 [171]

The correct answer is - B: England was the only place to produce iron.

Though initially England was the only industrialized country in the world, and it managed to develop the iron industry before anyone else, that doesn't mean at all that the iron was not produced at other places.

The iron was produced since very long time ago prior to the industrial revolution by numerous people. It is very abundant metal in the nature, so most people had lot of reserves of it. The difference is that the other people were not able to mass produce it because everything was still done manually, while England managed to create the industry and the machines, so was able to mass produce it.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 450 mm equals how many meters. Please explain how to convert
    11·1 answer
  • Who were the skeptics
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone please answer this pleases!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • What do the lines making a circle around the low-pressure area indicate?
    11·2 answers
  • What is one way the Constitution addresses conflicts between federal and state governments?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was hatshepsut concerned abt creating a myth
    8·1 answer
  • How did labor unions help workers?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the name of person who travel to anther country to do religion work
    7·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE, A.S.A.P.....!
    9·1 answer
  • The main purpose of the many purges and public trials that took place in the Soviet Union in the 1930s was to Question 5 options
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!