All categories

3 years ago

Why is (x^2+2xy+y^2) greater than 2(x+y) when x and y are over zero and X>Y

Mathematics

1 answer:

VikaD [51]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is true because if we were to plug in values for x and y the first equation will have a greater value.

Lets try 2 for x and y......

2^2+2(2)(2)+2^2

4+8+4

=16

and for the other expression

2(2+2)

4+4

And 16 is greater then 8 this is true for all real rational numbers

You might be interested in

Round to the nearest tenth, I will give brainlyest PLEASE

BabaBlast [244]

1. cos B= a/x

x= 11/cos 37°

x= 13.77

2. tan A= a/x

x= 4/tan 41°

x= 4.60

3. sin B = x/c

x= sin 37° × 10.3

x= 6.20

4. tan A= a/b

tan A= 4/13

A= tan-1(0.31)

A= 17°6'10"

5. cos A= b/c

cos A= 12/13

A= cos -¹(0.92)

A= 22°37'12"

6. tan B= a/b

tan B= 3/3

tan B= 1

B= tan‐¹(1)

B= 45°

7 0

2 years ago

What is 5 fifth plus 4 fifth

dedylja [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the GCF of 96 and 567 The GCF is. A 16 B 2 C 14 D 8

vazorg [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Choose the congruence theorem that you would use to prove the triangles congruent.

Elena L [17]

Answer:

SAS

Explanation:

Before solving the problem, let's define each of the given theorems:

1- SSS (side-side-side): This theorem is valid when the three sides of the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second triangle

2- SAS (side-angle-side): This theorem is valid when two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle

3- ASA (angle-side-angle): This theorem is valid when two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle

4- AAS (angle-angle-side): This theorem is valid when two angles and a side that is not included between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and a side that is not included between them in the second triangle

Now, let's check the given triangles:

We can note that the two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle

This means that the two triangles are congruent by SAS theorem

Hope this helps :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me plsssssss! asappp. I'll mark brainlest and give points

Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1)a) Abscissa of O 0

Abscissa of A 4

Abscissa of B -3 {opposite of 3}

Abscissa of C 3 {3 is the only positive integer like A}

Abscissa of D -4.5

Abscissa of E -6

Abscissa of F -1 {Midpoint of AE = (6+4)/2 = 10/2 = 5th number from -6 or 4}

b) OB = 3 units

DA = 8.5 {4.5 +4 = 8.5}

7 0

3 years ago