The answer is a) <span>survive the hanging.</span>
Answer: The effect of the point of view is A) the reader gets direct advice on the process. Moreover, the author's purpose is A) to explain how to get around meat restrictions. Finally, the point of view that the author uses in this passage is B) Second person.
Explanation: The point of view that the author uses in this passage is second person as<u> he is directly addressing the reader.</u> What indicates this is the <u>use of the second person pronoun "you"</u>. As a result,<u> the reader receives direct advice from the writer</u>, which is mainly expressed in the first sentence ("If you are really determined to eat meat all week, it is possible to buy a license to do so"). Therefore, the advice is the effect of the second person point of view. As regards the author's purpose, <u>he intends to explain the reader how to eat meat despite the restrictions</u> set on the consumption of this type of food. This is also expressed in the first sentence of the passage.
Answer: Do you have any hobbies, for instance, any sports, arts or science programs?
Explanation:
This sentence is considered as sentence fragment and dependent clause and if we are wanting to rewrite the sentence so that it can be independent clause we must have appropriate meaning and idea of it.
- It can be anything but for example it could be: Do you have any hobbies, for instance, any sports, arts or science programs?
In this case the sentence is independent and it has meaning. The speaker is asking if the person is having hobbies and he is asking what those hobbies, for instance, are.
We can infer here that what actually happened to Ned is that Mr. Reamer angrily carried him up to beat him up. If I am in Ned's shoes, I will be ashamed.
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference actually refers to the conclusion that one arrives to after evaluating the available and necessary evidences. Inference is known to be reached after observation and experiments have been cried out.
We see here the way Mr. Reamer picked Ned shows that he was angry with what Ned said in Navajo.
If one is in Ned's shoes, such person will be ashamed. This is because such act looks insulting. Mr. Reamer, as stated in the passage is seen to be angry and to have to carry Ned like a puppy.
Learn more about inference on brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
