Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
I would say that the answer is -
To put together a better outline for the essay.
Since it would help you put together your rough draft.
Hope i helped!
;D
Answer: B
Jerome is ethical because he cited his sources and used them to develop his own slant on the topic.
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the act of taking the work of an individual, using them and passing them off as one's work. Emerson was ethical as she did not copy the works of another source word for word, in fact she blended it with her own wordings and where she couldn't find add her own perspective she paraphrased and sited the source in her speech.
