Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
The answer to the question is c) Check
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The Atlanta Campaign was a campaign undertaken by Union Major General William T. Sherman. In the campaign, series of war took place between the Union army and Confederate army in 1864.
The purpose of Sherman through the Atlanta Campaign was to destroy the enemy army and capture Atlanta. Though Sherman was unsuccessful in destroying the army, he was able to bring Atlanta under Union's subjection.
With the thought in mind that Confederate may not again capture Atlanta, he destroyed the city before embarking on his famous 'March to the Sea.'
So, the correct answer is option B, that Sherman took Atlanta under Union's control and destroyed it.
Answer:
the military ambitions of Woodrow Wilson
Explanation:
