Hello. You forgot to add this part to your question:
The goal is to evaluate and express your personal entertainment level in the following areas: Story Plot Main Characters Plausibility Special Effects
Answer and Explanation:
The chosen film was: The breakfast Club.
The breakfast Club was a film produced in 1985 and tells the story of five teenagers who had some kind of bad behavior at school and had to spend an entire Saturday in detention. These teenagers do not know each other and are part of totally different groups and live different realities as well. At first the plot seems simple, but it becomes very profound when the characters begin to tell their dramas and interact with each other, even in the midst of their differences. Detention becomes a type of "group therapy" and it's amazing to see how the characters manage to let go with real people, who have problems.
The film is extremely plausible in most factors, especially when it shows that even with the moment of complicity that teenagers have, they will not maintain their friendship, as they are very different from each other.
As the film takes place in the real world and portrays real dramas, special effects were not used, but this does not diminish the quality of the film, which establishes itself as fun, dramatic and full of layers with different meanings.
The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.
The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made". It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.
Answer: im perrty smart but not like th
is
Explanation:
