Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
Answer:
Rivers change the surface of the earth. They are the agents of erosion, deposition and transportation. When rivers flow, they erode the rock with them and strong current pushes them. ... After cutting, they carry the stone, pebbles and other solid things and when the current is slow, they deposit the load on the land.
The answer is A, because it is the most broad, and it is one of the main purposes that a government exists in the first place.
Answer:
https://www.kqed.org/lowdown/14066/13-years-later-four-major-lasting-impacts-of-911 hope this kinda helps
Answer: Parol evidence rule.
Explanation:
Parol evidence rule is the regulation that restricts the presentation of any evidence while oral contract before the existing period negotiation that can tend to manipulate, alter or contradict the terms mentioned in the written contract .
This law usually comes into action when some particular terms and expression of contract is being determined or completed. This rule is implied because it can change the contract or agreement when it has already reached the final stage. This law is followed in Anglo-American region.
