1. The idea behind the concept of multiple intelligences is that human intelligence can take different "modalities," as opposed to being dominated by a single general ability. I think this is a valid construct, as it approaches the concept of "intelligence" from various different angles, not always considered when discussing intelligence in other contexts.
2. As we do not have access to this text, we are not able to answer this section of the question.
3. One way in which the developers of a test of multiple intelligences could demonstrate the validity of the test using evidence would be by also researching the behaviour of the people who took the test out in the real world. They could compare these results to the results of the test. In this way, they would be more likely to find out whether the intelligences mentioned in the test are indeed exercised in real life.
4. A passage from the Bible that could support this idea would be the following:
<em>1 Corinthians 12:12-14 – "Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptised by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many."</em>
In this passage, the idea of many parts within a single body is presented. However, it is also stated that the many parts of the body in fact end up forming a single entity. This is similar to the multiple intelligences that combine to give a single personality capable of certain things.
The social groups in ancient Egypt were pharaoh, vizier, high priests and nobles.
Pharaoh were the kings of ancient Egypt. In Egyptian civilization, the pharaohs were considered living gods. The Egyptians believed that these rulers were direct children of the god Osiris, so they acted as intermediaries between the gods and the Egyptian population.
Vizier was Pharaoh's prime minister and assisted him in managing many kingdom affairs. He had the job of transmitting the king's orders, collecting taxes, administering justice, controlling the state of public works, and also controlling river transport.
High Priests in the social hierarchy below only in Pharaoh. Endued with enormous prestige and power, they were the Priests or responsible for religion and various functions in the administration of the Egyptian Empire. They were considered the wise men of Egypt.
Nobles the third class was intended for the nobles. Among them military chiefs, who were responsible for the security of Egyptian territory.
The answer to this question is <span>draw the line as to what exactly was too strong of a shock.
After a certain amount of shock of delivered, the learners plea to stop the experiment increased according to the level of the voltage.
When the learners are encouraged that they could take more, they felt some mental reassurance that they could take more because they do not understand the thresold of other learners can do.</span>
What to produce, how to produce, and for whom to produce.
