The detail from the passage that best supports the inference that Samoset's visit to the community positively changes the relationship between the colony members and the Native Americans is "<u>Being after some time of entertainment and gifts dismissed, a wjile after he came again...called Massaoit"</u>
<u />
Based on the passage, the colonists had were not able to communicate with the Indians, until Samsoet courageously came up to them and spoke broken English to them that they could understand.
After this visit, they were able to gain a lot of things from their relationship which benefitted them tremendously.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/24419036
The given statement about effective examples referring to people and places that can be recognized by the readers is TRUE.
<h3>What is an Effective Example?</h3>
This refers to the type of example that is used to show or make emphasis on something that would bring better insight.
Hence, we can see that based on the fact that the primary aim of an effective example is to bring clarity, they would use places, things, actions, etc that can be easily related to.
Read more about examples here:
brainly.com/question/3653791
#SPJ1
A run<span>-on is a </span>sentence<span> in which two or more independent clauses </span><span> are joined without an appropriate punctuation or conjunction = )
</span>
Answer:
It shows disrespect towards the other person.
Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
