Answer:
In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.
Explanation:
i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it
Firstly, to answer this question, we need to understand the definition of each of the terms that they're asking about! Here are some quick, by no means complete, definitions:
Utopian: The belief that the current society one resides in can be improved to a perfect society; the desire to change the society one resides in to a "better" version of what it is
Socialism: The belief that the workers should control the workforce
Communism: The belief that everything should be split among everybody and that no social classes should exist (while one of the main reasons for the existence of social classes being the uneven division of materials)
Now that we have that out of the way, let's just try to find one system for each that contradicts the choice:
A. Well, communism has been known to want/do two things. The first being a worldwide "sharing" association, with everybody being on board with communism, and the second being communists have used industrialization to assist with the achievement of their goal. So, with those combined, communism eliminates that choice from being feasible.
B. Utopias, for the most part, condone the use of violence, as they believe that is a factor that causes issues in modern societies. So, Utopian beliefs eliminate that choice.
D. Communism believes that the government needs full control of the system at first, then give the power to the people. So, that leads to the elimination of D.
We are now only left with C. Why is that the answer? Well, Utopias most often change the capitalistic system, Socialists want control and more equality, and communism is the cited opposition to socialism. Therefore, C would be the correct choice. <span />
Answer:
i believe the answer is B.secular
The Mayans natural resources was limestone, salt and volcanic rock, and were able to thrive in it despite unstable climates. They could grow corn, beans, squash, and cassava in the most harsh and difficult to live in environments
