1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helga [31]
3 years ago
15

Which of these statements describe the reasons why American leaders were divided? Check any boxes that apply. The Democrat Repub

licans sided with Germany over France. The Federalists sided with Great Britain while the Democrat-Republicans sided with France. The Federalists believed that Great Britain would restore order to Europe. The Democrat-Republicans believed that the violence in France was only temporary. The Democrat-Republicans saw France as an ally in Democracy.
History
1 answer:
lana66690 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Democratic-Republicans saw France as an ally in Democracy.

                                                 &

The Federalists sided with Great Britain while the Democratic-Republicans sided with France.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
. List at least one law that was passed in the colonies that helped to secure the practice of slavery
timama [110]
14th amendment . Which granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former slaves—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.”
6 0
3 years ago
Only 38 of the 144 englishmen who made the first voyage to what would become jamestown, virginia, survived the first year. this
Oksanka [162]

Answer;

-Malnutrition, disease, and the failure to let go of traditional notions of class and labor.

The high mortality rate is explained primarily by malnutrition, disease, and the failure to let go of traditional notions of class and labor.

Explanation;

-The Virginia Company of London paid to transport servants across the Atlantic, but with the institution of the head right system in 1618, the company enticed planters and merchants to incur the cost with the promise of land.

-As a result, servants flooded into the colony, where they were greeted by deadly diseases and often-harsh conditions that killed a majority of newcomers and left the rest to the mercy of sometimes-cruel masters.

6 0
3 years ago
Which politician led the labour party to a disastrous defeat in the 1983 british general election?.
Veronika [31]

The Politician that led the labor party to a disastrous defeat in the 1983 British general election was Michael Foot.

<h3>What won British general elections in 1983?</h3>

The British general elections was won by Neil Kinnock in 1983 against the politician named Michael foot. Labor party election was the held in England for the election of party leader.

The Neil Kinnock won the election with 71% votes and the runner up being the Roy Hattersely was made the deputy leader of the labour party.

Thus the politician who got defeated in labour election 1983 was  Michael Foot.

Learn more about election here:

brainly.com/question/11185151

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Fill in the blank with the right answer. According to the chart, which type of school had more students? schools
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

The school with more extra curricular activities has more students than other schools which focus only on education.

Explanation:

Extra curricular activities like sports and recreational activities are important for students with provision of education. Students age is a learning age where a child learns the different aspects and his mental and physical development takes place. Sports activities keeps students fit and creates healthy competition motivates students to improve their performance.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the benefits and risks of abolishing the electoral college? Do you believe that the Electoral College should be abolish
melisa1 [442]

Answer: the benefits and risks of abolishing the elctoral college are that for one we are going to start off with the benefits of it!

Benefits:

1.)The electoral college makes sure everyone is involved in choosing on who gets to be the next president during election time.

2.) The electoral college guarantees fairness to the outcome of the next president

Risks:

1.) It might slow down election process and things might be based more off of people being biased

2.) Everyone might not have the same say so on who the next president will be

In my opinion i think that the electoral college shouldnt be abolished because as much as a cliche as it is we really do rely on the electoral college on terms of fairness and getting everyones voice heard. I hope this helps you! please mark brainliest!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can you please answer this !!!
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the party-nominating conventions, which were started during the Jacksonian era?
    12·2 answers
  • 1. In what Pennsylvania city is there a law on the books that prohibits a person from sipping a
    8·1 answer
  • HELP! What effect(s) did the closed-country policy have on Japan?
    7·2 answers
  • 1. According to Crevecoeur, what happened in the “New World” that didn’t happen in Europe? Why?
    6·1 answer
  • The subsurface sources of water is?​
    7·2 answers
  • If the world had a population of 7,700,000,000 and an annual growth rate of 1.6 percent, how many people will be added to the wo
    15·1 answer
  • Jesus presented his Sacred Heart to a saint and devotion to his heart spread because of this. Who was this Saint? What was the m
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST summarizes a common argument against admitting California as a free state?
    8·1 answer
  • Asap asap asap asap asap Which statement best describes the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!