Answer:
The cost recorded for the equipment=$66,500
Explanation:
When dealing with the total cost of an equipment we take the purchase cost and other additional associated costs that come with the equipment. This can be expressed as;
T=P+A
where;
T=total cost
P=purchase cost
A=additional costs(transportation cost+sales tax+installation cost)
In our case;
T=unknown
P=$60,000
A=(1,000+3,000+2,500)=$6,500
replacing;
T=60,000+6,500=66,500
The total cost=$66,500
The cost recorded for the equipment=$66,500
Answer:
The boy: 8 years old
The sister: 11 years old
Explanation:
We assume that the age at present of the boy is x (years old).
As he is younger than his sister 3 years, so that his sister's present age is great than x 3 years
=> Her present age is: x + 3 (years old)
Two years ago, the boy is younger than present two years
=> The boy's age two years ago is: x - 2 (years old)
Similarly, the sister's age two years ago is: (x+3)-2 = x + 1 (years old)
As given, two years ago he was two-thirds of his sister's age, so that we have:
<em>The boy's age two years ago = </em>
<em> × the sister's age two years ago</em>
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
=> x + 3 = 8 + 3 = 11
So the present age of the boy is 8 years old, of the sister is 11 years old
The court found the employee status because he had and agreement indicating that he was an independent <em>contractor</em>.
<h3>What is an independent contractor?</h3>
It should be noted independent contractors are the contractors that don't work under an employer. They work independently.
In this case, the court found the employee status because he had and agreement indicating that he was an independent contractor.
Learn more about independent contractor on:
brainly.com/question/7429981
#SPJ1
He’s not even lost or missing he probably ghosted you please stop sharing this and move on