How are we going to do this for you and you do not have a book
The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>
- This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.
- This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.
- From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.
- At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.
Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.
Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701
<span>I believe the answer is: The Action part
The action part refers to the parts of the firearms that are involved in ammunition loading and the ejection of the shells. The lock on a muzzle loader has both of these functions with additional safety measurement to prevent unintended/ accidental shootings.</span>
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The Anti-Federalists were afraid of a too powerful central government and refused to endorse the 1787 Constitution. They preferred a looser confederation like the one created by the Articles of Confederation. On the other side, the Federalists proposed and believed in a strong federal government. James Madison was a Federalist and one of the authors of the Federalist Papers.
Answer:
There might be a problem with food, good living space, and poverty.
Explanation:
<u>The overpopulation of this kind can result in a lack of food and lack of suitable living space for people. This can end up in poverty as well. </u>
<u>The country might not have enough land to harvest enough plant food or raise the cattle and other animals for animal-based products</u>. <u>People might not have enough to eat.</u> County can end up importing more and more food. If the country is not rich in the first place, this will cost them a lot and food can become expensive. This can result in loss of money both for the country and people.
<u>The land also can become very expensive if there is not enough of it. </u>People might end up living in very small and crowded places. Anything bigger and more suitable for leisure living would be too expensive for people. We see that Japan, while a very rich and developed country, has a lack of living space in overcrowded cities such as Tokyo. People live in very small apartments while paying a lot for the living space.
