Answer:
they are interns hope it help
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>Kelvin</u> to choose <u>right</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Kevin chooses <u>right</u> and Maria chooses <u>left</u>.
Explanation:
A dominant strategy can described as a strategy that makes a player better off no matter his or her opponent in a game chooses.
In the game in the question, when Kelvin plays left, it best for Maria to play right because 4 > 3. But when Kelvin plays right, Maria will play left because 7 > 6. Therefore, there is no particular strategy that will make Maria better off. This implies Maria has no dominant strategy.
On the other hand, when Maria plays left, Kelvin will play right because 6 > 4. And when Maria plays right, Kelvin will still also play right because 7 > 6. This implies that no matter what Maria plays, Kelvin will always be better off by playing right. Therefore, the dominant strategy for Kelvin is right.
The implication of the above analysis in that the only dominant strategy in this game is for Kelvin to choose Right.
The only dominant strategy in this game is for <u>Kelvin</u> to choose <u>right</u>. The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Kevin chooses <u>right</u> and Maria chooses <u>left</u>.
Answer:
$161,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given in a situation where the company is considering the purchase of a land which we were told was acquired by the seller for the amount of $97,000 which means that if the percel of land was later purchased for the amount of $161,000, the land should be recorded in the purchaser's books at $161,000 which was the land purchased amount.
Therefore the land should be recorded in the purchaser's books at:$161,000