This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. The options are as follows:
[...] Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson have been together for 23 years, as have Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick. Denzel and Pauletta Washington have been married for 28 years, Billy and Janice Crystal for 41 years, and Bill and Camille Cosby for 47 years.
A. brief examples
B. synthetic examples
C. repetitive examples
D. enumerated examples
E. informative examples
Answer:
The kind of supporting materials being used in the excerpt is:
A. brief examples
.
Explanation:
<u>The purpose of using brief examples is to simply further illustrate or demonstrate something to the audience that they may not know, that is not so obvious to them. That is precisely what we have in the excerpt we are analyzing here. The speaker merely wishes to show his/her audience that there are several couples in Hollywood who have been married for quite some time. There is no need to used, for instance, an extended example here. What has been said so far is not so complex as to demand a lengthy example</u>. Notice that the speaker is not necessarily enumerating the couples, nor is he/she providing two much information about them. Their names and how long they've been married are briefly stated, which is enough for the purpose of illustrating the affirmation that "Not all Hollywood marriages are doomed to quick failure."
Answer:
is there someting to read ?
Explanation:
The other factor is location/place
The restless kangaroo
<em>Setting</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>story</em><em> </em><em>one</em><em> </em><em>day</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>kangaroo</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>playing </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>her</em><em> </em><em>joey</em><em>(</em><em>baby</em><em> </em><em>kangaroo</em><em>)</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>She</em><em> </em><em>saw</em><em> </em><em>an</em><em> </em><em>elder</em><em>ly</em><em> </em><em>wombat</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>all</em><em> </em><em>alone</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>told</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>kangaroo</em><em> </em><em>he</em><em> </em><em>was</em><em> </em><em>overlooked</em><em>,</em><em>lonely</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>abandoned</em><em>.</em><em>The</em><em> </em><em>kangaroo</em><em> </em><em>decided </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>wombat</em><em>.</em>
<h2><em> </em><em> </em><em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>you</em></h2>
It is false that a major characteristic of poetry is the compression of images into the fewest number of words. You can be as wordy as you want, there is no limit of words you can use.
