The correct answer would be option C: "feels slightly foolish about the events that occur", this due to the way the excerpt is written, since, it seems the author wanted to let the readers know that the narrator isn't stupid, so that they keep that in mind, when they read about a foolish thing said narrator did. If the narrator did something dumb, then option A and B would be discarded, as would option D.
By adding actors and more action
If you receive a 1 on the ideas and content rubric, it may mean that : the severity and the frequency of errors are so overwhelming that the readers find it difficult to focus on the message. You might want to try a little bit harder if you only receive a 1.
hope this helps
Answer:
We're gonna need more than 5 points
Explanation:
In the first act, it is introduced to all the main characters such as Capulets, Montague, even dramatic Hero Romeo. In
the precursor to the first act, we are talking about struggles over the
years, two aristocrats "[f]rom ancient grudge break to new mutiny".
Therefore,
we talk about one of the central disputes: that the two familes are
fighting each other. That central conflict enhances the concept of being
hostage against destiny which leads to both Romeo and Juliet's death.
In the first scene, it introduces the characterization of a character centered on Romeo's painful rash emotional heart. In
the second and third scenes of the first act, we were introduced to the
heroine Juliet and gave hints on Juliet about another dispute that
might be involved in Paris.
In
the last scene of the act, the hero and the heroine meet under intense
conditions, show the emergence of character-to-fate confrontation, and
show the conflict of character against character as seen from Tybalt's
anger and insult feeling Capulet's ball.
As
all of these introduce and serve to raise a conflict, we
confirm that the purpose of Shakespeare obviously uses the first act as
an exhibition.
