Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer: The correct answer is "D. Use the show filter to filter report results and reduce records returned".
Explanation: If sales users are complaining that opportunity reports return too many results, making it difficult to find their team’s opportunities in the report results it would be convenient <u>use the show filter to filter report results and reduce records returned.</u>
If Xerox commercializes PC technology and its rivals do not Xerox payoff is expected to be $250m, whereas the competitors’ payoff is $75m.
<h3>What is game theory?</h3>
This is the game strategy that involves two players where each of the players have to pick the most favorable choice based on the choice of the other person.
Here it would be best for Xerox to pick option B because this is where they would be able to get the most advantage.
Read more on game theory here:
brainly.com/question/13548182
#SPJ1
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Game theory can help us understand why Xerox did not successfully exploit the opportunity it had inIT. If both Xerox and competitors continue with old technology the payoff for XeroxSelect one:a.
is $150m, whereas the competitors’ payoff is $325m.
b. is $2
50m, whereas the competitors’ payoff is $75m.
c.
is $75m, whereas the competitors’ payoff is $250m.
d.
is $325m, whereas the competitors’ payoff is $150m.
Answer: $10,746
Explanation:
Using Compound interest formula
A= p(1+r/n) *nt
A= final amount =?
P= initial principal =$8, 000
r = interest rate = 0.1
n= nob of times interest applied(3)
t=nob of times period elapsed (3)
A = 8,000 (1+0.1/3) *9
A = 8000 (3+0.1/3) *9
A= 8000 (3.1/3) *9
A = 8000 (1.0333) *9
A = 8000 × 1.34327
A= $10,746
It depends on the property and location.
