Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) was an important decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case allowed the race to be one of the several important factors in college admission policy.
Allan P. Bakke,<span> an engineer and former </span>United States Marine Corps<span> officer, sought admission to medical school, but was rejected for admission because of his age. Bakke was in his early 30s while applying and after twice being rejected by the </span>University of California, Davis<span>, he brought suit in state court. The </span>California Supreme Court<span> ordered Bakke admitted.
Supreme Court ruled specific racial quotas for minority students. Racial quota is a numerical requirement for the racial groups in education and employment while graduating, hiring or promoting. </span>
Despite the desire of the French people for representative government, Napoleon sincerely believed that in fact the French had an instinctive need for some form of monarchy. He will provide a French monarchy more efficient, more ruthless and more powerful than any other in the "Ancien Regime." He will not only restrict the freedoms of the French, but undermined the Equality that was so dearly brought in the early years of the Revolution.
As emperor, he has recreated a French aristocracy, rewarding his generals with noble titles and estates. In all, there were a thousand barons, four hundred counts and thirty-two dukes in the Napoleonic nobility. He also turned his back on the religious attitudes of the Revolution by restoring Catholicism in France, and signing an agreement with the Pope in the Concordat of 1801.
Finally, I would point out that Napoleon had the art to preserve the appearance of continuity with the revolutionaries of 1789. Although the Constitution meant little in practice, he maintained the idea of constitutional government, while he was in fact a "dictator." However, Napoleon insisted that he was the representative of the French people with their approval, expressed in popular votes.
To some leaders, lawmaking was more efficient and faster when debated and voted for in only one chamber,as provided for in an unicameral legislature. This made the law responsive to changes in public opinion, involving them in the law making and amendment process. This therefore advocates for the availability of democracy in any particular society,creating more democratic governments.
4 hope this helped for you :)
Answer:
bro what
Explanation:
they would have like just started getting slaves they havent really boomed in america yet
