The correct answer is: "The blank clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allowed incorporation to take place in this case".
The Duncan v. Louisiana case took place in 1968 and gave rise to a significant US Supreme Court decision. They ruled in favour of Duncan. The main argument provided was that the guaranteeing the right to a jury trial was a central aspect in the conception of justice practiced in the US, and its provision should be carefully preserved.
Therefore, the decision appeals to the Due Process Clause that is included in the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution. This clause forces the states to attend and honor the resquests they receive for a jury trial. The exceptional cases in which those requests can be ignored are for the judicial procedures that arise from crimes considered as "petty crimes". This term includes those crimes which are punisahable with a fine of $500 maximum or with, at most, six months in prison.
Created<span> in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, </span>DHS<span> has largely focused on federal preparations to deal with terrorism while trying to manage other duties, including border </span>security<span>, customs and emergency management.</span>
Answer:
The Ming dynasty-allowed limited trade with the Portuguese
The Mughal dynasty-eventually taken over by the British
Both -produced spices and textiles that European kingdoms sought
The Ming dynasty-persecuted non-muslim subjects
The Ming dynasty-exchanged knowledge with the jesuits
Explanation:
The Ming dynasty limited the trade with the Portuguese, produced spices and textiles that European kingdoms sought and also persecuted non-muslim subjects. The Ming dynasty exchanged knowledge with the Jesuits. Jesuits initiated mission work in China introducing Western science, mathematics, astronomy, and visual arts to the Chinese imperial court while on the other hand, Mughal eventually taken over by the British as well as produced spices and textiles that European kingdoms needed.
Pretty sure it’s factories