Answer:
Compare: Estimate, measure, or note the similarity or dissimilarity between.
Contrast: Compare in such a way as to emphasize differences.
Therefore, to contrast is to compare. They mean the same thing. So, just write the differences and similarities between the two texts and you should be fine. It doesn;t matter what subject or topic it is, just stick to the guidelines..
Explanation: I hope it helps
She goes to her room and wants to be left alone. Just when the reader thinks that she will further indulge in her grief, she gazes through the window and whispers "Free, free, free!"
It is hard to say that Mrs. Mallard is heartless, or that she didn't love her husband at all, or that he had treated her badly. None of this is true, as far as the reader can see in this short story. The point is deeper than that. Mrs. Mallard feels freedom from marital restraints for the first time. This is what she enjoys so much. This is the first thing that comes to her mind the moment she is no longer surrounded with other people. When no one's watching her, she can give way to her real feelings - not because she is a hypocrite, but because it is hard if not impossible to stay true to oneself (and open about it) in a small community.
Answer:
In the short story "The Interlopers", Nature is treated as a character in the story. more explanation below.
Explanation:
There are many references to nature in "The Interlopers." as well as the storm and the feud over the forest. Nature also tops over the humans in the story. The evidence to this is <em>"The forest lands of Gradwitz were of wide extent and well stocked with game; the narrow strip of precipitous woodland that lay on it's outskirts was not remarkable for the game it harbored, but it was the most jealously guarded of all its owners territorial possessions."</em>
Von Gradwitz and Znaeym as the story progresses lose to nature. The nature is shown as superior to humans and something that man can not triumph over.
The conclusion.
It is the ending.
Hope I helped!!!:)
<span>To this question is yes. There are several reasons that have made me believe that it is morally justifiable in breaking the law; however the most convincing comes from Dr. Martin Luther King in his letter from a Birmingham Jail. We can never forget what that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal... (Classic Arguments 668). King went on in his letter to say that it would be against man made law to help a Jew in Nazi Germany. What King said in his letter has to make a person think that not all laws are good for the group in society and morality is a justifiable excuse.</span>