Bursary actually differs from student loan because bursary are grants given to help students further their academics while student loan are given to students which they are required to pay back.
<h3>What is bursary?</h3>
Bursary is actually known as an academic grant that a particular institution gives to a student in order to support the student in his/her academics.
While student loan has to do with the money given to students for any other reason but which must be paid back by the student.
Bursary is not paid back but student loan is paid back.
Learn more about student loan on brainly.com/question/16724065
Answer: The correct answer is C
Explanation: The correct answer is C, Stab the body and laugh.
The Greeks found it funny that Achilles was able to strike down the warrior.
Answer:
man all you have to do is study there is no way on gods green earth somebody is going to take the time to answer that but here's what i reccomend ...Open a history textbook , look at the civilizations listed and then try to play connect the dots. easy peasy hmu if you have questions i will help but i will not give you the whole answer
Explanation:
Sure! do you want yours classy, baddie or softie ?
Answer:
The controlling idea of the text is that Simon Schama thinks and believes that William Shakespeare and the question of his authorship for some of his famous works of art is a question that needs no authenticity. Though some may believe that he is not capable of producing such 'famous works' considering his upbringing and education, his life experiences and 'imaginative creativity' helped him become who he was and is more than most of us too.
Explanation:
The controlling idea of any text is the opinion or the direction in which the author is taking the argument forward. This means that it contains the personal opinion and feelings of the writer about the topic of the text.
In the essay "The Shakespeare Showdown," author Simon Schama presents his opinion that there are many who question the authenticity of numerous literary texts that were written by William Shakespeare. Some even pointed out that Shakespeare is not 'intelligent' enough to have written them. But Simon believes that Shakespeare is indeed capable of writing those contested works.
While some may opine that <em>"[Shakespeare's] cultural provenance was too lowly, and his education too rudimentary, to have allowed him to penetrate the minds of kings and courtiers"</em>, there is no doubt that his <em>"capacity for imaginative extension was socially limitless",</em> thus helping him become who he is today. And in the words of William Hazlitt, <em>"He was nothing in himself, but he was all that others were, or that they could become."
</em>
Thus, the controlling idea of this text is that Shakespeare was and is indeed someone capable of authoring those 'contested' books and is more too.
