1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sophie [7]
3 years ago
13

What do you mean? Oh, oh

English
2 answers:
krok68 [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In love that song

Explanation:

kumpel [21]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

what do you mean oOoOoH

Explanation:

justin beaver

You might be interested in
What is the narrators main conflict in this paragraph
skelet666 [1.2K]
The inciting incident, the conflict, in the plot is Jim Smiley making a bet with his "<span>celebrated jumping frog." The </span>rising action<span> creates suspense for the reader when the challenger fills the frog with buckshot (little metal balls) in order to keep the frog from jumping. This is done without Jim Smiley's noticing. As a result, the </span><span>climax</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Michaela is presenting research on modern trends in the fast food industry. Which should be one of the first things she includes
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

B- An explanation of the research question

Explanation:

See attachment :)

5 0
2 years ago
Select the correct answer.
atroni [7]

Answer:

i think b. is the answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does television news gain credibility and likability?
Licemer1 [7]
Television news gain credibility and likability by doing the news <span>live on the spot reporting. This makes the news more convincing and this would convince people that it is true and believable. In addition, prints are also another form of news, but this gains credibility through neutrality. Hope this helps.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the nervous system and skeletal system and muscular system work togeather
    11·1 answer
  • Which kind of order is most appropriate for a procedural text ?
    10·1 answer
  • Take these cheeses, get them stowed, come back,
    11·2 answers
  • 16. In “Nolan Bushnell,” which of the quotations below appropriately describes Bushnell’s
    8·2 answers
  • Select the letter of the correct answer.
    5·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt below and answer the question.
    11·2 answers
  • Based on Dr. King’s speech, what can faith do for mankind? What is its power?
    13·1 answer
  • What are the subject and verb of this sentence?<br><br> You need to learn how to write correctly.
    6·1 answer
  • What do you like anh dislike about your extended family?
    11·2 answers
  • Write an essay on achieving a dream (the essay is supposed to be motivating especially now that there is a pandemic)
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!