<span>My worst problem is the inability to speak clearly in public. <em>This </em>is not true when I am with my family.</span> The pronoun reference "this" in the sentence is used incorrectly because it used to refer to the whole sentence before it. It implies that the antecedent is "<span>My worst problem is the inability to speak clearly in public."</span> However, the readers don't know which part of that statement "is not true when I am with my family". Is the problem not true? Is the inability to speak clearly in public not true? The antecedent is vague, and we can say that (3) there's no specific antecedent.
The correct answer is C. In clinical psychology, the therapist tries to treat mental disturbances without prescribing drugs; therefore, this branch of psychology often carries the label talk therapy.
Explanation:
Comma splice and fused sentences are the results of incorrect punctuation or lack of punctuation between two complete sentences or independent clauses. This can be corrected if a semicolon is added between the sentences, which can include one conjunction such as however, therefore, etc. after the semicolon. This correct punctuation occurs only in C because, in this, the two independent clauses are separated by a semicolon, which does not occur in options A and B.
Answer:
The patient is cooperative and determined
Explanation:
Answer:
I think the answer would be B.
Explanation:
If all of the premises are true in a statement, inductive reasoning allows for the conclusion to be false.
For example "Harold is a grandfather. Harold is bald. Therefore, all grandfathers are bald." The conclusion does not follow logically from the statements.