Answer:
I would just stick with the 4th amendment, which states that tha people can't just tresspass on to your property and police can't search your house just because they want.
Explanation:
Answer:
Chopped down trees and made a log house, and built it by a lake so I had water cause you can live your entire life on water so I would boil the water from the lake to disinfect it and I have water and I would have Packed A LOT of food so I had something to eat.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore