Answer:
C. Cliffhanger ending
Hope I helped please mark brainliest! :)
Your regards,
Lillith
Answer:
Using a causative sentence to describe the situation:
The boxer had his nose broken during a match.
or
The boxer got his nose broken during a match.
Explanation:
<u>The verbs "have" and "get" can be used as causative verbs. That means they can indicate that the subject of the sentence is not the one who performed the action.</u> Mostly, causative verbs are used when we wish to imply that we asked or paid someone else to do something for us. For example:<u> I had my house painted last summer.</u> --> I was not the one who painted the house. I paid someone to do it for me.
Having that in mind, we can take the situation in the question (the boxer whose nose broke during the match) and describe it with causative verbs in the following manner:
The boxer had his nose broken during a match.
or
The boxer got his nose broken during a match.
:O wall of txt!
Q&A:
Which description provides the best objective summary of the article in the passage?
A. The purpose of the article is to tilt the reader’s opinion against food labeling for genetically engineered food. It presents expert opinion to support the claim that genetically engineered foods are safe and dismisses the opposing arguments.
B. The purpose of the article is to tilt the reader’s opinion in favor of food labeling for genetically engineered food. It refutes claims that genetically engineered foods are safe by using expert opinion to support the opposite claim.
C. The article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. It examines the claim that genetically engineered foods are as safe as organic foods and then examines claims to the contrary.
D. The article presents a balanced view of the debate about labeling genetically engineered foods. Its purpose is to demonstrate fallacies in different arguments for and against the claim that genetically engineered foods are safe.
it includes pros n cons so its a balanced view. it also examines both claims so ans is C
Answer:
Because the longer the focal length, the smaller the patch of sky you're observing. But a longer focal length also gives a higher possible magnification.
B.proud is the right answer
