Answer: can you be a little more specific?
Explanation:
Please
Answer:
The distinction drawn between Hamsun and Ibsen which interference seems most reasonable is explained below in complete details.
Explanation:
Both the approach and the notice use language to communicate their information. diction is described as a way of typing or speaking based on the kinds of terms chosen to convey a message. parallelism is when a related sentence formation is practiced for various sentences on a topic; Roosevelt's behavior doesn't catch that. repetition has to do with reproducing a speech or sentence to highlight an idea, however neither the advertisement nor the address use replication. finally, the address doesn't use pictures to carry a message.
This question is incomplete. Its full version is:
On the afternoon of that eventful day, I stood on the porch, dumb, expectant. I guessed vaguely from my mother's signs and from the hurrying to and fro in the house that something unusual was about to happen, so I went to the door and waited on the steps. The afternoon sun penetrated the mass of honeysuckle that covered the porch and fell on my upturned face. My fingers lingered almost unconsciously on the familiar leaves and blossoms which had just come forth to greet the sweet southern spring. I did not know what the future held of marvel or surprise for me.
Which answer choice best describes the imagery in the excerpt?
- Sensory details appeal to the reader's sense of hearing.
- A metaphor creates a visual image for the reader.
- A simile creates a visual image for the reader.
- Sensory details appeal to the reader's sense of touch
Answer:
The right answer is option 4.
Explanation:
IMAGERY: it is figurative language used to represent objects, actions, and ideas in such a way that it appeals to our physical senses. E.g. Time is slipping through my fingers.
In this excerpt, taken from "The Story of My Life" by Helen Keller, the answer that best describes the imagery is option number four "sensory details appeal to the reader's sense of touch".
I conclude that this proclamation is not an outright abolition of slavery, even though it settled liberation of slaves in the Southern states. It provided the chance to all slaves who would be able to flee from Southern states to get their freedom and, if they wanted, to enroll in the army. Lincoln didn't say that all slaves will be free, but only "all persons held as slaves within said designated States and parts of States". Obviously, it was a war measure, and not a civil rights act.
