The discussion technique that Jennifer uses most clearly in this conversation is, challenging assumptions.
When we want to give a discussion a different approach, we use this technique through What if... questions, it is necessary to present another alternative to respond to things that we already established.
The other techniques are very different from this one, promoting participation would be mostly used by a moderator not a regular participant in the conversation, MAking an objective is to land the discussion into something real, and Asking for rhetorical questions does expect any kind of answer which we do have in here, therefore the other three options are incorrect.
Answer:
the second one
Explanation:
the question is asking what would be the best evidence arguing that the migrants were intruders. So Most of the migrants headed for the cities of California explains that the migrants are intruders because they aren't from California. Also it can't be the all the other choices because they are not specific on where the migrants are heading.
Answer:
ill take the long drive :)
Explanation:
<u>Answer:</u>
In the excerpt from the “Four Freedoms” speech, Roosevelt see the present threat to American security and safety as unprecedented because (B) No nation has ever attempted to destroy the world's democracies.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Franklin D. Roosevelt’s speech highlighted four freedoms in his speech: freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want and freedom from fear.
The speech he delivered emphasized on the policy of intervention in World war II. It had become significant for them to break their initial policy of not participating in the war. It was time to take strong action because there was a threat to America's security. None of the countries had earlier attacked world democracy but it was possible then that this would happen.
