Natalie wants to make a 25% profit on a $70000 sale. That would be:
(125 ÷ 100) × 70000 = $87500.
Natalie wants to make $87500. But the agent would charge a 6% for the sale, Natalie will add a 6% to the $87500, that would be:
(106 ÷ 100) * 87500 = $92750.
On this $92750, there's a closing cost of $1200,
Add $92750 + $1200 = $93950.
$93950 to the nearest hundred will be $94000.
Natalie should make the final sale price $94000 in order to make a profit of %25.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The conservative approach is that the firm has greater level of working capital investment than the competitor or industry average. So to fund the higher level of working capital the company has a set of policy and targets related to the level of debt level which means the company will not be willing to borrow further money if their borrowing exceeds the set limit or benchmark. They might use the equity instruments (Preferred stock or Common equity) to fund the higher level of working capital.
So their no absolute argument whether the denominator will increase or the nominator will increase in the Total debt to capital ratio. Hence the statement is false.
Answer:
disparate impact
Explanation:
Disparate impact refers to practices followed in employment, housing, and other areas that affect one group of people more than the another group, although rules applied by employers are neutral.
Disparate impact explains employment discrimination on the basis of the effect of an employment policy or practice.
In the given questions, the CEO's argument is an example of <u>disparate impact
.</u>
The step transforms the item toward completion (something changes)
The step is done right the first time (not a rework step)
The customer cares (or would pay) for the step to be done.
Answer:
The opportunity cost of buying 3 CDs is the lost opportunity to buy 1 DVD
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the cost of alternative forgone.It is cost of the item not purchased due the current buying decision.
It is also applicable to a business division selling to another division within the company.The cost of such internal sale is viewed as the variable cost of the product plus the contribution forgone from not selling to external party.This is most likely the case when the selling division does not have a spare capacity with which it can fulfill internal sale request.
