Answer:
a. $50,000
b. 2.25 times
c. 0.75 times
Explanation:
a. The formula to compute the working capital is shown below:
Working capital = Current assets - current liabilities
where,
Current assets = Cash + accounts receivable + merchandise inventory
= $16,000 + $44,000 + $60,000
= $90,000
And, the current liabilities would be
= Wages payable + accounts payable
= $10,000 + $30,000
= $40,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
= $90,000 - $40,000
= $50,000
b. Current ratio = Total Current assets ÷ total current liabilities
= $90,000 ÷ $40,000
= 2.25 times
c. Acid-test ratio = Total Current assets - merchandise inventory ÷ total current liabilities
= $90,000 - $60,000 ÷ $40,000
= 0.75 times
Answer:
PV 550,506.64
Explanation:
<em>PV = 550,506.64</em>
<u>We can convert the discount rate to interest rate and reach the same value:</u>
<em>PV = 550,506.64</em>
Answer and Explanation:
Indeed, Ismail have a solitary performance presentation commitment to the client in the mentioned arrangement of revenue.
Despite the fact that the exhibitions of different fields is in the execution of the agreement, he goes into an agreement to plan and assemble an emergency clinic which incorporates the need of building, site leeway, establishment, acquisition, development of the structure, channeling and wiring, and establishment of hardware.
Answer:
Have the highest risk and rates of return and the highest standard deviations.
Explanation:
The efficient portfolios of N risky operatives is the set of optimal portfolios that offer the highest expected return for a defined level of risk or the lowest risk for a given level of expected return. And in other words, portfolios that lie below the efficient frontier are been described as sub optimal because they do not provide enough return for the level of risk. Portfolios that cluster to the right of the efficient frontier are sub optimal because they have a higher level of risk for the defined rate of return.
Answer:
Oral warranty was used by the seller.
Explanation:
The scenario shows that the proper warranty made by the seller to win N’s interest was premised on need. That is to say, by demonstration, N walks into the departmental store and was immediately approached by the seller who begins by exchanging pleasantries and thereafter introduces the new product to N by specifically outlining its benefits as compared to previous models. All of this warranty was made orally and not written.
