Pros are that it’s a very self sufficient system of growing, made land management easier, it allowed for simplistic chain of command.
Cons are that it was easy to abuse the power given, the kings could raise taxes whenever they wanted, and you couldn’t marry someone from another social ranking
It's either A or B, I'm leaning towards A.
the homestead act encouraged western migration by providing settlers with 160 acres of land in exchange for a filing fee. the morrill act made it possible for the new western states to establish colleges for their citizens
The two motivation includes the protection of consumers and dismantling of monopolies.
In order to better American society, more emphasis was placed on openness and accountability in government during the Progressive Era.
There have been numerous reforms throughout this time regarding, among other things: women's political rights, food safety regulations, civil service reform, workers' rights, and others.
Anti-trust laws were put in place as a set of guidelines to safeguard consumers from unfair business practises and promote competitiveness among producers.
Therefore, the Progressive Era's anti-trust laws were inspired by the need to safeguard consumers and break up corporate monopolies. The only method to break a legal monopoly is to put pressure on the government to alter the legislation and eliminate market limitations through a procedure known as deregulation. This may be the result of consumer demand, a shift in technology, or lobbying by businesses looking to enter a market.
Learn more about dismantling of monopolies:
brainly.com/question/27868407
#SPJ4
