The answer is The U.S. didn't annex the Philippines
Answer:
It depends on what you have been taught, but I would personally say negative because of the diseases that destroyed Native Americans and the rise of slavery.
On the flip side, if you're thinking of positive, it did help exchange new ideas and goods (the Columbian Exchange) between the worlds. It also allowed a safe haven for those persecuted (like the Protestants) and allowed countries to dump their inmates onto the new land.
<span>They coped by maintaining their family system and friends, they kept tradition alive by naming their children after relatives and passing on stories, and also took comfort in religion</span>
One similarity in the rule of Akbar the Great and <span>the rule of Elizabeth I is that both leaders implemented policies that encouraged religious toleration, but to different extents. </span>
It helped the French economy, which strengthened Napoleon's army.
