1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew-mc [135]
3 years ago
12

The Missouri Compromise ended the slave trade, but how was the balance of power maintained?

History
1 answer:
strojnjashka [21]3 years ago
5 0
In the Missouri, compromise balance was maintained with the 36 degrees 30 minutes latitude. Which in effect proposed<span> that Maine would enter as a free state, Missouri would come in with slaves, but no slavery would be permitted in other states developed out of the Louisiana Purchase north of 36 degrees 30 minutes latitude, Missouri’s southern boundary</span>
You might be interested in
“Fighting in the forefront of the Hellenes, the Athenians at Marathon destroyed the might of the gold-b“Fighting in the forefron
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

spartans

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plz help
Effectus [21]

Answer:

The previous government was democratic; Hitler was a dictator.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a response of the Emancipation Proclamation?
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

Southerners felt that the proclamation was not a law at all and just a political stunt by Lincoln.

Explanation:

The proclamation was aimed at freeing slaves .

The south had already been taken away , its representatives were taken to the congress with supervision .

This one was not taken as freedom since it was only supposed to happen on the rebellious states .

President Abraham Lincoln used the "Vacate   Congressional seats " tactic to know which of the states were still on rebellion.

7 0
3 years ago
Please someone help me
zimovet [89]

Answer:

D vote

Explanation:

Please mark brainliest!

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the framers of the Constitution want the selection of justices to be non-democratic
GuDViN [60]
The reason why the Framers of the Constitution wanted the selection of justices to be non-democratic is because they didn't wanted these justices to be "swayed" by public opinion, which could allow them to make judicial decisions based on what would most likely get them re-elected, as opposed to what was in the best interest of the country. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One of the main reasons andrew jackson decided to weaken the bank of the united states after the 1832 election was
    11·1 answer
  • Most Israelites became and
    13·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe American Enlightenment thinker Benjamin Franklin?
    11·2 answers
  • Describe mass society and explain how it affected the economy and leisure activities
    15·1 answer
  • These cities were part of the Roman Empire.
    10·2 answers
  • How did scientists develop new views about the universe?
    6·1 answer
  • Under Mexico’s rule of Texas, African Americans had all of the following rights EXCEPT:
    9·1 answer
  • What most affected the agreement between the United States and Great Britain over the Caribbean border?
    7·1 answer
  • What is one reason the U.S. economy grew significantly after the war?
    11·1 answer
  • Which president made this pledged to veterans to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!