Answer and Explanation:
Hello. You did not show the text to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for the question to be answered efficiently. In the meantime I will try to help as much as I can.
To find the answer to your question, it is necessary that you read the entire text and find the message that the author wanted to convey, that message is the theme of the text. Then, you should look for phrases, within the text, that support this theme and interpret how those phrases are related to the term "food".
Just before chapter 17 of To Kill a Mockingbird. Hope it helps sorry if it don't.
1. Imprecise. The chef will not know how long he has to cook.
2. Vagueness. We are not sure how many politician exactly.
3. Incomplete meaning. We just know tall students are allowed to play basketball, but there are no further explanations.
4. Vagueness. We are not sure how many lies do the Prime Minister say.
5. Lexical ambiguity. The word "suspects" have two meanings in this sentence. The first one is a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offence. The second is a person who commits robbery.
6. Syntactic abiguilty. We are not sure whether peter's wallet was stolen by General Office or was found by General Office.
7. I am not sure with this question.
8. Equivocation. Common has been used for two times but with different meanings.
9. I am not sure with this question.
10. Referential ambiguity. We are not sure which article exactly. They should provide the name of the article
Hope this help you
I think Intelligence itself is a high risk of CR infringement........coz it requires running informants, wiretapping, trying to keep tabs on everyone, and threatening to charge them with critical offenses if they never turn states evidence.
also , you need ability to monitor and interdict your operations.
