Though both sides received benefits, however, the north seemed to gain the most. It seemed so because the major victory for the south was the Fugitive Slave Law. In the end, the north refused to enforce it. By extension, it shows that the north seemed powerful.
<h3>What is better deal in the Compromise of 1850?</h3>
As part of the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about the Compromise of 1850: brainly.com/question/8165267
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
Why did the south defend slavery so vigorously even though only 25% of the ... After 1830 - A number of factors (outlined below) forced southerners to change their defense. Instead ... If one considered that a slave in 1850 was worth $2000 then losing 200 slaves would mena a loss of $400,000. ... Early Childhood Education
The correct answer is A. They had elaborate trade networks.
Explanation
Trade networks are a form of the economic relationship between human communities in which products or services are exchanged for other goods or services or exchange currency. With the arrival of the Europeans in America, it was discovered that the native communities had a very elaborate network of commercial relations that allowed them to exchange their products with the other tribes in different parts of the wide American territory, from where they could obtain different products such as sea fish, river fish, the meat of domesticated animals, fruits, and other products of agriculture. So, the correct answer is A. They had elaborate trade networks.
Both men foresaw the US as a great future power. However, they differed on the path the nation was to follow in achieving this role. While Jefferson preferred an agrarian nation, Hamilton favored an industrial and business intensive nation. As such, Jefferson detested Hamilton's idea of a strong federal government. Jefferson wanted the bulk of power to rest with the states. While Hamilton distrusted popular will and believed that the federal government should wield considerable power in order steer a successful course, Jefferson placed his trust in the people as governors. These major views were behind polarizing Washington's cabinet into two distinct factions. Hamilton's followers became known as Federalists and Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans. Hamilton and Washington were already close to one another so it makes sense that Washington gave Hamilton the attention he did. More than anything Hamilton's views were prized by Washington; he very well may have been the most socially liberal and economically liberal man of his time, Jefferson stood to counter this with ultra-conservative views and policies. The idea was for there to be a sort of balancing act with the cabinet and it worked out quite well for Washington and the united states. <span>Perhaps because of their differences of opinion, Washington made these two men his closest advisors.</span>
