Alea iacta est ("The die is cast") is a variation of a Latin phrase (iacta alea est) attributed by Suetonius to Julius Caesar who pronounced it in the year 49 B.C. when he was leading his army across the Rubicon river in the current territories of Northern Italy. Subsequently, he entered in Italy heading his army and defying the Roman Senate and it meant the beginning of the civil war versus Pompey and the Optimates.
- Plutarch, referred to the same event in his written testimonies and reported the phrase but stating it was pronounced in Greek instead of Latin and that its translation meant: <em>'Let the die be cast'.</em>
- Suetonius described the same situation, reporting a very similar phrase but not exactly the same. Let's include the exact excerpt of his writings where he did so.
<em>Caesar: '... iacta alea est,' inquit.</em>
<em>Caesar said, "The die has been cast."</em>
Thefore there are two very similar versions of the same historical events. Usually the Latin version is the most widely known, as the Latin language was more widespread all over Europe and gave rise to all the current family of Latin languages (Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, etc).
C - They had a rivalry during that time
Quakers settled in Pennsylvania...founder of William Penn William Penn was the absolute proprietor of Pennsylvania (he held the royal charter) and had pronounced religious tolerance for all. Other colonies were often religiously linked and intolerant of religious views outside narrow limits.
He welcomed Catholics and Quakers among others. Because the Colony was established as a refuge for European Quakers. Pennsylvania was a favorable place to settle: climate, land, port and government. Philadelphia was at the time the best developed city in the continent.
Because the Colony was established as a refuge for European Quakers.
You see, William Penn was a friend of king Charles the second and the king did not want to kill William Penn for being a quaker. So he basicly gave him a grant to find land so he would escape persicution. Then have a place for religious freedom.
Answer:
I think it is two votes for this one
Answer:
A lawlessness society and government
Explanation:
An Anarchist is someone who does not obey law and order, who disregards social norms and rules of established authority. An Anarchist may be described as someone who rejects the laid down laws and order of a given society. An Anarchist does not believe in the society being regularized by laws and order. Anarchists are those against political authority, people capable of creating anarchy in a society, reject all forms of hierarchical control by the authority. Anarchy is therefore a state constituted without laws and order, rules and social norms, a society without ruler. A state of Anarchy is a lawless society where there is no government, no constitution, lay down laws and orders are not complied with, no morality whatsoever, people who commit crime and walk freely in the society and go unpunished, that is, where there is no justice in the society, people’s fundamental rights are violated, people’s property attacked.
Pierre Joseph Proudhon, a French political writer and socialist was said to be the first person to willingly call himself an anarchist.
The kind of government an Anarchist will support is that government without constitution, law and order, that government that allows people to violate the laid down rules and social norms, that allows people to go against the political authority, government that allows self-governing of people and society consensus, that is, allows people to do what they want without questioning by the government, that guarantees individual’s right of liberty, a government that allows political power and resources to be shared equally by all in a given society.
