Answer:
Reason 2
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason should be transitive property( if a=b and b=c then a=c) not reflective property.
What we have to find in this question
We will use the right Riemann sum. We can break this integral in two parts.

We take the interval and we divide it n times:

The area of the i-th rectangle in the right Riemann sum is:

For the first part of our integral we have:

For the second part we have:

We can now put it all together:
![\sum_{i=1}^{i=n} [(\Delta x)^4 i^3-6(\Delta x)^2i]\\\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}[ (\frac{3}{n})^4 i^3-6(\frac{3}{n})^2i]\\ \sum_{i=1}^{i=n}(\frac{3}{n})^2i[(\frac{3}{n})^2 i^2-6]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7Bi%3Dn%7D%20%5B%28%5CDelta%20x%29%5E4%20i%5E3-6%28%5CDelta%20x%29%5E2i%5D%5C%5C%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7Bi%3Dn%7D%5B%20%28%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bn%7D%29%5E4%20i%5E3-6%28%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bn%7D%29%5E2i%5D%5C%5C%0A%5Csum_%7Bi%3D1%7D%5E%7Bi%3Dn%7D%28%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bn%7D%29%5E2i%5B%28%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bn%7D%29%5E2%20i%5E2-6%5D)
We can also write n-th partial sum:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The given expression is

We will rewrite the expression

When we add the fraction
=
= 8
While Andre says the answer is 
because Andre added the denominator where he has to make a common denominator that should be 4 instead of 8.
Andre made mistake in this step
Picture is given below :
The defect rate of a company is equal to the probability of a randomly selected sensor from that company being defective.
Breaker's has a 4% defect rate, so the probability that a Breaker's sensor being defective is 4%, or 0.04.
The answer is A) 0.04