Casually reading it for spelling and grammatical errors- 1 1/2 weeks
finding personal errors ans pronunciation issues- 6 days
speaking aloud to yourself or other for practice- 5 days
seriously practicing and getting jitters out of your system- 3 days
good luck!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I would respond to an attorney who argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception, in the following way.
People have the right to exert their own freedom to the degree they do not mess with my freedom of defending my privacy or they do not mess with the privacy of other people.
So this means paparazzi have the freedom to allow for the best shots of artists or public figures when these public figures are in a public sphere or scene: working, public appearances, red carpets, and so on
But there is a fine but notorious line that these paparazzi must never cross. And that is the private life of people. And that always must be respected, no matter what.
Private life is of no interest to the audiences.
What do you mean? Its too vague to understand
Answer:
Drugs mostly harm today's society. They cause permanent physical, emotional, and mental damage, and very few can recover. Drugs often lead to sickness and disease. Overall, the consequences are widespread. Not to mention, the cost of drugs is a big issue and it becomes even bigger when one considers how the user's addiction causes them to buy even more. The addiction makes people more violent, as well as more inclined to persuade others to take part in these drugs.
The use of these drugs affects people's comprehension and common sense, giving a rapid increase in car crashes, injuries, and arrests. Especially in this modern society, people have more ways to pass on drugs (by texting others, threatening to "expose" others online, and viewing more TV ads for drugs.)
<em>I don't know if this is quite 500 words, but at least it is a start. Hope it helps!</em>
A is the answer you are looking for
