The conflict that's developing is both are fighting over land and who will get it at the end so Buckminister is thinking on what to do next.. he questioning and the stone person is stating what will lead to them being removed but Buck as you can see is thinking of ways to avoid this .. i would say answer is <span>Turner’s father, Reverend Buckminster, is torn about what to do about the people on Malaga Island and needs more time to think</span>
Answer:
Hmm, ok. Though what is the question...?
The Great Vowel Shift was primarily a change in phonetics.
Phonetics is a linguistic field which has to do with sounds in a language.
The correct answer is C. Challenging assumptions
Explanation:
A discussion technique refers to different methods that guarantee the discussion is effective or guarantees the exchange of ideas between the participants flows. Common discussion techniques include asking questions, guiding the discussion, stating opposing ideas, challenging assumptions, among others. In the case of challenging assumptions, this discussion technique focuses on re-examining carefully through questions the assumptions or ideas already stated in order to consider them from a different perspective and determine if they are valid or have been just wrongly assumed.
Consider Jennifer is mainly asking questions about the ideas of Daniel in order to make him reconsider ideas from a different perspective it can be concluded she is mainly using challenging assumptions technique in order to challenge the ideas previously assumed about the title of the work. Therefore, in this conversation, the discussion technique Jennifer most clearly shows is challenging assumptions.
Well, you're going to talk about the conflicts in The Lottery and The Lady or the Tiger... So... in The Lottery, the main conflict was that the lady (whatever her name was) was chosen to be stoned in the lottery. It wasn't really resolved in anyway, except that she got.. stoned. I haven't read The Lady or the Tiger, but you would do the same thing for that. Then you would state the theme, or moral, or main point, of each story. And then you would compare how the resolutions for both conflicts demonstrate the stories' themes.. Does it make a bit more sense?
